About Me

Name: Always To The...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

The Mediagasm Continues

Kurtz: Partisan adulation in the media

If anyone doubted the bias in the media during this election, the inauguration appears to have had the singular salutary effect of proving it.  Howard Kurtz has a good look at the phenomenon up close and personal today from his Washington vantage point.  He’s having trouble distinguishing between the media and the cheering throngs, because apparently the media are the cheering throngs

At least they’re being honest about it.  MS-NBC has been the All-Obama Network for over a year, with Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews vying for Top Media Sycophant honors.  Besides, Bill Press has never given any pretense at being objective; he’s an opinion journalist, a pundit.  The problem isn’t the Bill Presses of the world — it’s the supposedly objective media, who profess detachment on air and in print, but on Facebook issue updates like this:

  • “voted for change”/”change is coming”/”yes we did”/”is thrilled.”
  • “is hoping the American people elect to leave behind the dark ages and step back into the hopeful light. It’s been a long time.”
  • “helped turn her state blue.”
  • “I live in the United States of America again.”
  • “is getting out the vote for Barack Obama.”

Kurtz finishes with this warning:

After broadcasting half-frozen from the Newseum roof, watching endless television and attending all these media parties (I know, tough job, somebody has to do it), I can report that there really is an electric feeling in the city, unlike any I’ve seen before, going back to Jimmy Carter. But on Wednesday, we’ll still be in a financial mess and mired in two wars. Nobody expects Obama to solve these problems overnight. The media will need to aggressively chronicle what he’s accomplishing and where he’s falling short.

But after the year-long mediagasm, they have little credibility left.  Who’s going to trust them to report honestly and not cheerlead for The One?  The hagiographic journalists who report on his accomplishments will sound like propagandists for the new administration, not reporters.  And it says something deeper about media bias that Kurtz detects this “electric feeling” after attending so many media parties.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush And The Press

Bush's Final Jabs
President Bush came before the White House press corps for the last time on January 12 to thank them for doing their jobs. This exercise was akin to thanking the sharks who ate you.

Bush grew agitated as he remembered the press pounding him for seeing Hurricane Katrina damage from the sky on Air Force One without landing in Louisiana. He said – correctly – that had he actually landed in Baton Rouge, it would have required police to leave the disaster scene to protect him, and reporters would have savaged him for that. No matter what the president did or didn’t do, he was going to be attacked.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AP’s Final Dig At President Bush

Michelle Malkin  •  January 15, 2009 09:36 PM

President Bush delivered his farewell address this evening. He leaves a mixed legacy. I give him credit where it is due and blame where it is due. But one thing is unadulterated: The pure contempt of the man from the MSM.

Here’s how the Associated Press headlined its dispatch about the speech:

Bush address includes laundry list of back patting

And there you have it: One final, BDS-tinged kiss-off masquerading as news.

Yes, I think I hear cheering from the AP newsroom, too.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hard Lesson The Russians Learned … 65 Years Ago

Schools close when fuel turns to goo

Last Friday, kids got another rare day off due to the weather.  Actually, the weather was just the indirect cause.  The real problem?  Biodiesel fuel

The Russians discovered the problem with diesel fuel during World War II.  In cold weather,  the fuel in the tanks solidified, making them both useless and defenseless.  The Americans stuck with gasoline, which had bigger safety problems but proved reliable for combat.

Apparently, biodiesel makes the problem worse.  The school district tried getting a waiver from the state to allow their buses to use regular diesel fuel, to no avail.  Instead, buses stalled throughout the district and across the state.  Children had to be treated for hypothermia by school nurses after either waiting for buses that arrived far too late in -20F weather or on buses that stalled and whose heaters don’t function without running engines.

This is an absurd requirement for school buses in a state that sees these kinds of low temperatures every year.  If the fuel cannot be used in -20F weather, then we should be using fuel that works when it gets that cold.  Having school children stand or sit in that kind of weather for any extended period of time is dangerous.  To think that using a politically-correct form of fuel is more important than their safety or education demonstrates an obtuseness that simply boggles the mind.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spike Lee: God Ordained Financial Crisis To Ensure Obama Victory

I guess this lets those evil Wall Street speculators off the hook . . .

Spike Lee has declared that God himself ordained the financial crisis to happen when it did in order to propel Barack Obama to victory.  The film director offered his odd analysis on today’s Morning Joe . . . but not before declaring that tomorrow’s inauguration will be “the most important day in the history of the United States of America.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Thought the Jeremiad Was Over?

The return of Rev. Wright
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Official Flag Of The Obama States Of America

Michelle Malkin  •  January 17, 2009 04:58 PM

Defacing the flag in honor of the inauguration of Barack Obama?

Well, don’t you dare question their patriotism.

Baltimore Sun photo
flag-desecrate.jpg
Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 3 of US Code

US Flag Code: “The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.”


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Reaches Out For McCain’s Counsel

'Many of these appointments he would have made himself'...

Over the last three months, Mr. Obama has quietly consulted Mr. McCain about many of the new administration’s potential nominees to top national security jobs and about other issues — in one case relaying back a contender’s answers to questions Mr. McCain had suggested.

Mr. McCain, meanwhile, has told colleagues “that many of these appointments he would have made himself,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican and a close McCain friend.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi Open To Prosecution Of Bush Administration Officials

Pelosi: Hey, let’s prosecute the Bush administration

The House speaker suggests to "FOX News Sunday" that the law might compel Democrats to press forth on some prosecutions of Bush administration officials, saying they may not "have a right to ignore" them.

President Bush issue pardons while you still can.  Let the Democrats complain about it.  They can't wait to start the investigations.  This does not even count the money people will have to spend to defend themselves.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Climate Change & Other News

Browner: Redder Than Obama Knows - Incoming White House energy-environment czar Carol Browner was recently discovered to be a commissioner in Socialist International. While that revelation has been ignored by the mainstream media and blithely dismissed by her supporters, you may soon be paying the cost of Browner’s political beliefs in your electricity bill. (Steven Millioy, FoxNews.com)

Obama’s anti-oil team - The president-elect is poised to hand environmental policy to people who want to punish petroleum

The environmental lobby is positively rapturous over Barack Obama’s new “Green Dream Team,” appointed to stomp out our carbon footprint. In sharp contrast to the president-elect’s relatively moderate — if not downright stale — picks for other cabinet posts, the green teamers are widely regarded as unwavering in their devotion to more stringent regulations and steeper taxes. To the extent they accomplish their goals, Canada will suffer as America’s foremost petroleum supplier and leading trading partner. (Diane Katz, Financial Post)

Inclusive Science - Because their specialized knowledge confers authority, climate scientists should make every effort to be accurate and complete when communicating to the public about the politically divisive issue of climate change. Unfortunately, there are several points where Alexander Bedritsky's thought-provoking article "Meteorology and the War on Climate Change" (Summer 2008) fails to do this.

Bedritsky states that "human activities are altering the climate at an increasingly alarming rate." However, according to data from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the rate of planetary warming that was established in the mid-1970s has been remarkably constant, varying only slightly from 0.17°C per decade. (Patrick J. Michaels, Harvard International Review Fall 2008)

Hillary adopts W's climate policy? 'India need to be part of climate change agreement' - WASHINGTON: The US Secretary of State-designate, Hillary Clinton, has said countries including India must be made part of any agreement on climate change and announced that the Obama Administration would appoint a Climate Change Envoy for the purpose.

"As we move toward Copenhagen and attempt to craft a climate change agreement, all the major nations must be part of it. You know, China, India, Russia, and others, they have to be part of whatever agreement we put forth," Clinton said during the course of her nomination hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee yesterday. (Economic Times)

Actually what she's saying is there will be no climate agreement since India has already categorically refused to limit per capita emissions below that of Western nations (i.e., a many-times GHG emission increase).

Bush’s Climate Negotiator Joins House Republicans -- Harlan Watson, President George W. Bush’s chief negotiator on a global climate-change treaty, will join the Republican staff of a House committee on energy independence and global warming.

Unsettling observation - Remember how that fictitious claim of an epidemic of type 2 diabetes in children that had been published in Pediatrics, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, went uncontested for years? In fact, four years later, the journal has yet to issue a correction or publish a letter pointing out the glaring methodological flaws in that paper.

It’s hard to know what is most troubling: the fact these articles are being published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, or that licensed medical professionals caring for children haven’t noticed anything amiss with the science.

Zealots advancing on all fronts - The striking figure in Sandy’s analysis of the Third Hand Smoking myth is that within a week half a million stories appeared around the globe reporting as a scientific fact something that had simply been invented, without any attempt at producing scientific evidence: indeed, something that is contrary to the very laws of science. In a cooling world, despite huge amounts of contrary evidence, the imagined evils of carbon are propagated with ever increasing ferocity. The crescendo in the suppression-of-alcohol campaign continues unabated and as fast as junk statistics are debunked they are reinvented. The obesity brigade is as ruthless as any of them in fabricating stories with no scientific basis; frightening people into conformity.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tortured Logic

Should terrorists willing to strap explosives to their chests be freed because someone poured water down their nose? The ACLU thinks so and wants the killer of 17 American sailors freed.

Read Full Article

Last Wednesday, the Washington Post's Bob Woodward recounted how Susan J. Crawford, in her first interview since being named convening authority of military commissions by Defense Secretary Robert Gates, said the treatment of Mohammed al-Qahtani, 9/11's 20th hijacker "met the legal definition of torture" and "that's why I did not refer the case" for prosecution.

"The techniques they used were all authorized, but the manner in which they applied them was overly aggressive and too persistent," Crawford said.

There "was not any one particular act; this was just a combination of things that had a medical impact on him, that hurt his health. It was abusive and uncalled for. And coercive. Clearly coercive. It was that medical impact that pushed me over the edge" to call it torture, she said.

Crawford, who dismissed war crimes charges against al-Qahtani in May 2008, said in the interview that she would not allow the prosecution to go forward. But, she admits, "He's a very dangerous man. What do you do with him now if you don't charge him and try him? I would be hesitant to say, 'Let him go.' "

Mohammed al-Qahtani, also known as Detainee 063, is a dangerous man.

He had tried to enter the U.S. via Orlando International Airport in August 2001 when he was stopped by suspicious immigration officials. Just yards away, waiting to pick him up, was Mohammed Atta, ringleader of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

According to federal investigators, al-Qahtani was to have been the fifth hijacker on United Airlines Flight 93, the "muscle" that was to have guarded the cockpit door. Had he been there, the passenger rebellion that steered the 757 into a Pennsylvania field might have been unsuccessful. Had Atta collected him in Orlando, flight 93 might have reached its destination and plowed into the U.S. Capitol.

The ACLU took it a step further, claiming in a press release that the charges against another Guantanamo detainee, Abd al-Rahim Hussain Mohammed al-Nashiri, should be dropped because he had also been "tortured" by being waterboarded. Nashiri is a notorious al-Qaida terrorist, responsible for orchestrating the USS Cole bombing, which killed 17 American servicemen, as well as other attacks.

We will never know how many Americans are alive today because we made the likes of al-Qahtani, al-Nashiri and Khalid Sheik Mohammed uncomfortable. But they are and we are, and it is precisely because we have been "aggressive and persistent."

We hope the new administration ignores the sob sisters and strives to keep it that way.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Follow The Leader

Video: Obama launches the permanent campaign

You didn’t think he was going to disband the cult just because he’s president now, did you? Behold the launch of Hopenchange 2.0: Turning his grassroots organization from an operation to get him elected into an operation to pressure members of Congress to adopt his agenda. And by “members of Congress,” I don’t mean Republicans.

What fascinates me is his faith that his supporters, almost all of whom are Democrats, can be counted on to side with him on policy against … other Democrats. There’s no reason in principle to believe that’s true — Obamites logically should prefer his position on economic recovery to McCain’s, but to Chris Dodd’s or Barney Frank’s? — but it’s perfectly sensible if you view Obamamania as a cult of personality with The One as the object in whom all trust is reposed. (See also.) He does a superb job of cultivating it too, from using the paparazzi to enhance his status as an icon to dumping one dopey Lincoln allusion after another on a media that’s itching to make the comparison. In theory it’s a bad idea to have a party “rooted around” one individual — but The One isn’t just any individual, or so we should believe. If Lincoln told you to dial up some Blue Dog Democrat and ask him to vote for another bailout, you’d do it, wouldn’t you? Well, there you go.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More News

Elected Republicans like Lindsey Graham who praise Obama and cave to him and his dangerous agenda, do so at their own peril. This is one reason I'm a conservative first, not a flunky or water-carrier for the GOP.

Oh, Really? Obama Says It Doesn't Matter if We Catch Bin Laden or Not

"It's just not realistic to expect people who are immersed in the unapologetically liberal aspect of our pop culture to, every four years or every two years, go to a voting booth and vote conservative."

Profound Piece on Breitbart's Big Hollywood: Why We Fight, by Andrew Klavan

Obama has had more transition scandals -- Richardson, Geithner, Blago, Emanuel, Holder, etc. -- than most administrations. But he "clears" them, and the MSM accept and endorse his power to do so.

"Tim Geithner took a tax holiday.  This is on top of not paying his income taxes at the IMF and not paying his nanny taxes and having illegals working at his house. You try doing this."

So what if Geithner didn't pay his taxes, employed an illegal, and claimed tax breaks he wasn't entitled to? For Democrats, this is a resume enhancement to "learn from."

Obama's "promises" all have an expiration date. The latest is Club Gitmo and coal. He's going to close Gitmo...in four years, maybe. 

McCain lost because of McCain. He gave nobody any substantive reason to vote for him. Essentially, he ran a Democrat campaign when it came to illegal immigration, global warming, campaign finance, and interfering in the private sector.

The Obama presidency. I hope he fails.  Everybody thinks that's outrageous to say.  What's unfair about saying I hope liberalism fails?  Were the liberals out there hoping Bush succeeded or were they out there trying to destroy him? Liberalism is our problem. It's what has gotten us dangerously close to the precipice.  Why do I want more of it?"

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Six Of One, Half-Dozen Of The Other

Obama backpedaling on stem cells?

Carrie Budoff Brown seems to think Barack Obama has flip-flopped on another campaign promise, but the difference is procedural, not substantial.  Obama campaigned against the Bush executive order barring federal funding for research on embryonic stem cells and said he would reverse it once elected.  Now Politico reports that Obama has backed away from that pledge, but only because he has a way to share the burden

The irony here is that adult stem cells can deliver the pluripotentiality of hEsc products now, with much more stability.  There is little reason now to fund embryonic stem-cell research, which is one of the reasons why hEsc projects can’t find enough private financing.  Bush didn’t block hEsc research, as some claim, but only federal funding for research into new lines, and since that time, it’s been shown as unnecessary — and hEsc has never actually led to any therapeutic solutions anyway, while adult stem-cell therapies have had considerable success.

Now Obama wants to back away from his pledge to end the executive order, but clearly Politico’s headline, “Obama may not lift stem cell limits,” is either irrationally optimistic or simply ignorant of what follows.  Obama intends on having the policy reversed, but instead of doing it by himself, he wants Congress to initiate the changes.  Can Congress override an executive order?  I don’t believe they can, so at some point Obama will have to vacate it — but he’s not going to impose the actual policy change by executive order.

That makes some sense from a procedural point of view.  Congress should initiate most policy, and the executive should work with and through them to get his agenda passed.  It fits with Obama’s statements from the campaign about his views of the relationship between the White House and Capitol Hill, and his criticisms of Bush’s views on that subject.

That doesn’t make the policy right, however, nor does it amount to a reversal on hEsc funding, unfortunately.  Obama knows he can get Congress to initiate federal funding for research built on the destruction of human embryos.  If he can get that kind of political cover, why not use it to the fullest?



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Other News


Article printed from The Foundry: http://blog.heritage.org

URL to article: http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/16/morning-bell-the-borrowing-bailout-parade-must-end/

URLs in this post:

[9] fiscal responsibility summit:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2009/01/obama_to_hold_fiscal_responsib.html

[10] making strangers on the street friendlier.:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-15-obamapoll_N.htm

[11] Hints at Nationalization:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/business/16banking.html?ref=todayspaper

[12] President Bush’s terrorist surveillance program is constitutional:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011502311.html

[13] As the years passed, most Americans were able to return to life much as it had been before 9/11. But I never did.:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2226.cfm

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive