About Me

Name: Always To The...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

The Sky May Be Lower But It Isn't Falling

There is probably something in every generation that makes us think the problems we face are uniquely difficult.

Read Full Article

Much has been written about the economy and, if you accept certain assumptions from what you read, you might think that we are in the midst of a global depression.

Yet it is important to put the current economy in perspective. We might even try reviewing and analyzing some objective data.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Priorities

What the Panetta appointment means

Barack Obama sent a message with the selection of Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff, but apparently didn’t think enough people understood it.  He sent a stronger message yesterday with his choice of Leon Panetta for Director of CIA, and this time, it’s unmistakable.  Political considerations will trump competence and experience, even in the most critical roles Obama has to fill

The US is currently fighting an asymmetrical war on two hot fronts, but more to the point, in every corner of the world.  We need our best people at the helm at Defense and in the intelligence arenas, people with insight into the problems and challenges facing America at war.  Barack Obama either doesn’t understand that or cares less about security than he does about politics.

Leon Panetta only has indirect experience with intelligence. As budget director in the Clinton administration, Panetta has familiarity with their funding, and Panetta also served on the Iraq Study Group for several months, which looked at the role that intelligence failures played in our invasion and during the occupation.  There must be thousands of people more qualified to run the CIA from an experience and competence standpoint, including several members of Congress, notably Jane Harman, who should have chaired the House Intelligence Committee in the last session of Congress but ran afoul of Nancy Pelosi.

Even the notion of “change” doesn’t apply here.  Obama has no executive experience in government, and neither does Panetta, but Panetta hardly represents a breath of fresh air in Washington.  He’s another Clinton-era retread, only in this case, put in charge of an organization about which he knows nothing.  He’s there to exercise Obama’s political will and nothing more.

Obama deserves the benefit of the doubt on his political appointments, but this is one selection that should get a lot of scrutiny from Congress.  If Obama wants a political hatchet man in a high-level appointment, have Panetta run OMB — or Commerce, where there’s a late opening.  America deserves the benefit of experience and wisdom in the position of CIA director.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Clinton Redux

In addition to Attorney General designee Eric Holder, who in the Clinton administration served as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia and then as . . . Go
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nuance

Obama names Clinton crony who’s never worked in intelligence to head CIA

Why not? He named a Clinton crony with no foreign-policy experience to be Secretary of State, didn’t he?

Ace wonders if this is about having a dependable yes man at the top. Not really. It’s about having a guy at the top who’s untainted by “torture.” So untainted, in fact, that he’s also untainted by any intel experience whatsoever.

Here’s his chief qualification for the job, as near as I can tell. Whether this means Obama’s ready to junk the whole Bush interrogation apparatus or whether he merely wants Panetta as cover to quietly retain certain parts of it — or certain personnel, like Brennan, in lower-profile deputy roles — I guess we’ll see. Meanwhile, Brian Faughnan at Red State forwards an interesting passage from the CIA Library on Panetta’s spending priorities while head of Clinton’s budget office. Read it now, because the GOP’s bound to reference it at the confirmation hearing. Exit quotation: “Was Panetta wrong about the threats the U.S. faces in the 1990s, or was he simply too drive by green eyeshades over national security? Either way, the picture isn’t pretty.”


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Was The ‘Barack The Magic Negro’ Ditty Really Racist?

When conservatives say or do something racist or racially insensitive, they hand liberals the political equivalent of welfare — a benefit (in this case, greater support from minorities) for which one doesn’t have to work.

That hurts everyone — the conservatives who scare off or turn off voters whom they might otherwise win over; liberals who grow lazy and complacent because they don’t have to make their case to minorities to win their votes; and the minorities themselves who are written off by one side and taken for granted by another.

It’s a dynamic that could play out again thanks to a little ditty called “Barack the Magic Negro” — which found its way onto a CD which found its way into the Christmas stockings of members of the Republican National Committee, compliments of Chip Saltsman, a candidate for RNC chairman.  For Democrats, it could the gift that keeps on giving. That’s because the lyrics — and the fact that Saltsman would be thoughtless enough to distribute the song — make Republicans look bad, and Democrats look good by comparison.

The song is a parody of “Puff the Magic Dragon” that pokes fun at the verbal thrashing that President-elect Barack Obama got from old school black leaders who — when he first arrived on the national scene — didn’t respect him, trust him or think him viable.

The rap against Obama was that he wasn’t black enough and that, as someone with a biracial background who was raised in Hawaii by white grandparents, he was at a loss to understand the black experience in America. And it only made Obama’s critics in the black community even more suspicious that the young senator from Illinois had such magical appeal to white Americans.

Mimicking the voice of the Rev. Al Sharpton, the song — which first aired on Rush Limbaugh’s nationally syndicated radio show — begins like this:

Barack the Magic Negro lives in D.C.

The L.A. Times, they called him that ‘Cause he’s not authentic like me.

Yeah, the guy from the L.A. paper Said he makes guilty whites feel good.

They’ll vote for him, and not for me ‘Cause he’s not from the hood.

The tune is certainly provocative and amusing. The problem is that, for those who want to condemn it as racist — as many on the Left tried to do — it’s hard to get there with a straight line.

After all, this controversy didn’t begin with Chip Saltsman and the Republican National Committee. It didn’t even start with Paul Shanklin, the comedian who recorded the CD. The whole concept of “Barack the Magic Negro” originated on the Left, as a way for some to question Obama’s racial authenticity and deride the eagerness with which some white people used their support for Obama’s candidacy to demonstrate how progressive they were and assuage feelings of guilt over a history of racial discrimination.

This was all spelled out in detail by “the guy from the LA Paper” — Los Angeles-based writer David Ehrenstein, himself an African-American. In March 2007, just one month after Obama declared his candidacy for president, Ehrenstein wrote an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times. He wrote that, besides running for president, Obama was also “running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination — the ‘Magic Negro’ … while having to endure criticism (white and black alike) concerning his alleged ‘inauthenticity.’” And like the dragon in the 1960s folk song, Obama is — according to Ehrenstein — make believe. That’s the whole point. “The less real he seems,” Ehrenstein writes, “the more desirable he becomes.”

So if the concept of “Barack the Magic Negro” is racist, then who exactly is the racist? Chip Saltsman? Paul Shanklin? David Ehrenstein? Or maybe those African-American powerbrokers, like Rev. Al Sharpton, who questioned whether Obama was really black and applied a litmus test to find out?

Maybe it’s all of the above, or none of the above.

Maybe what we should be worried about, instead, is how quickly those on the Left jump at the chance to paint the opposing camp as hostile to minorities — so they can score cheap political points, manipulate the slighted, and continue to reap a benefit that is unearned.

Now that’s offensive.


Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com

URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/was-barack-the-magic-negro-ditty-really-racist/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Security

Poll: 46% believe Social Security should allow opt-outs

A majority of voters continue to agree with President-elect Obama’s proposal for workers to pay Social Security taxes on more of the income they earn each year. Sixty percent (60%) say people should pay Social Security taxes on all or most of their annual income. Twenty-nine percent (29%) disagree, and 11% are undecided.

Sixty-two percent (62%) of voters also say people who pay more in Social Security taxes should receive more in retirement benefits when they retire. Twenty-two percent (22%) are against that idea, with 16% undecided.

Over half (56%) of voters currently are not fully confident they will receive all of their promised Social Security benefits in their lifetimes.

. . . As part of his plan for shoring up Social Security, Obama has proposed levying the 6.2% tax on wages of $250,000 and above but not on earnings between $102,000 and $250,000.

That was the "base-$102,000" in 2008, for 2009; This [below] is from SSA.gov

Social Security's Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program limits the amount of earnings subject to taxation for a given year. The same annual limit also applies when those earnings are used in a benefit computation. This limit increases each year with increases in the national average wage index. We call this annual limit the contribution and benefit base. For earnings in 2009, this base is $106,800.




Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leading Democrat: Bush 'The Worst President We've Ever Had'

Reid on Bush: Worst president evah

Reid pointed to Bush’s failed plan to privatize the Social Security program and also said Bush “has done his very best to destroy Medicare” in order support his assessment of Bush’s presidency.


This one item shows how blind and sightless the Democrats are.  Due to the Democrat opposition Social Security will continue to be in very great danger.  I guess Reid forgot Clinton.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Parenting Tool: Barack Obama

Michelle Malkin  •  January 3, 2009 05:35 PM

The latest in Obama worship. Bring extra-heavy-duty airsickness bag before reading. Via the Washington Post:

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Other News

So now the "progressives" in Congress say any less than a $1,000,000,000,000 bailout is "like trying to put a forest fire out with a squirt gun." So, the $700 billion bailout was chickenfeed, and it needs a $1 trillion bailout.

"A Polish caller said to Rush last week, 'What the hell is going on with America? This is why I scrammed out of Poland.' Most of us who have come to America have come from places that have tried all of this. It's nothing new."

Colin Powell, who endorsed Obama, has told the GOP to throw out Rush and stop listening to him - as if they do! He also hates Sarah Palin and "the social stuff," meaning abortion. This is about Powell trying to please his fellow "Washingtonians," not about parties.

The guy who bolted and sabotaged the GOP nominee by endorsing the Democrat should stay in and be part of the team that determines what the Republican Party is going to be."

NewsBusters: Colin Powell Bashes Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin

"Hamas can lob as many rockets as they want at Israeli civilians, but the minute the 'Zionist entity' fires one back, 'Whoa! That's totally disproportionate!'"

Rasmussen: 55% of Dems: Israel Should've Tried to Find a Diplomatic Solution

Jerusalem Post: Israel to Treat More Injured Gazans


The global warming hoax. The truth is shocking, folks: the earth gets cold, and hotter. It doesn't stay a constant temperature.

"The government is proposing to take the Connecticut state newspapers that nobody wants to read anymore and publish them at taxpayer expense."

Reuters: Government Aid Could Save U.S. Newspapers, Spark Debate


"The 70s -- not just in Eastern Europe, but in Western Europe, Britain and a lot of other places -- were hell. And now all the policies that drove those countries into stagnation and hyper-inflation, President-Elect Obama wants to introduce here."

AP: Obama Team Seeks Public Input on Health Care

"Socialized health care is a suicide bomb-in-waiting."

Feulner: Health Care by Committee

• WP: Israel Launches Fresh Attacks

• Jerusalem Post: Israel to Treat More Injured Gazans

• CNN: Israel Says it Hit Hamas Rocket-Maker's Home

Reuters: Israel May Keep Options Open on Gaza Ceasefire

"It's very hard to find a diplomatic solution when you're on the receiving end of 20 rockets a day."



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy New Year

Bill Clinton’s name resurfaces as “caretaker” replacement for Hillary

Could the Caroline Kennedy bubble and bust have really been all about Bill?  CBS reports that Bill Clinton’s name has come up again as a “caretaker” appointment to fill out the rest of Hillary Clinton’s term in the Senate, more than a month after the former President publicly declared himself disinterested in the job

AP: Paterson close to picking Caroline

Why appoint an ex-president when you can appoint a princess?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive