About Me

Name: Always To The...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

The VP Debate

A point on the VP debate [whenever it is].  It's figured by the MSM pundits and the like that Senator Biden is so great that he will blow Gov Palin out of the water.  If Gov Palin can hold her own with Sen Joe Biden and not make any blunders it should come off as a victory for her.  Sen Biden has to be great to meet expectations, but Gov. Palin just has to be good, and not mess up, to look really great. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin And The Campaign

My, How Things Change! Newsweek Lavished Praise on Sarah Palin Just Last Year

By choosing Sarah Palin, John McCain has united this party, and given the conservative moment life beyond November. Biden, Harry Reid, Paul Begala, and other liberals lost their minds over Sarah's speech. Women rallied to her defense over attacks that she was "shrill."

Team Obama struggles to explain "community organizer" as an actual job after Sarah Palin turned it into a national joke. Ordinary people run for city council and become mayors. They don't become "community organizers."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Caving To The Fringies

Biden flip-flops on drilling

Biden went even further down the fringie road, too.  He told his audience that oil companies have leases on which they don’t drill now, asking “Why do you think [that is]?”  Maybe because they can’t find oil on those particular leases, which is why they want to look for more promising locations.  If they don’t drill long enough, under current law the leases will return to the federal government anyway.  They don’t make money by sitting on expensive leases, no matter how many conspiracy theories Biden can spin in his imagination.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Critics Are Missing The Point

Biden: We’ll go after the Bush administration

I’ve been getting a lot of e-mail about this clip of Joe Biden speaking at a campaign event yesterday in which he promised to go after the Bush administration
for “violations of the Constitution”.   Readers believe this to be an outrage, and perhaps it is, but for another reason altogether than what they think

Note too that Biden says IfIf violations occurred, they plan to investigate them.  As long as they stick to that approach, that seems not just fair, but fundamental to good government.

However, the real story here is that Democrats have controlled Congress for almost two years now, and they have conducted investigations into these allegations.  What have they found?  Nothing.  The 110th Congress has abdicated all of its other responsibilities to focus on witch hunts, hoping to find a Holy Grail of Bush Derangement Syndrome.  Despite wasting thousands of hours and millions of dollars, they’ve come up with a big nothingburger.

The real outrage here is either that the Democrats are so deep into the tinfoil hat brigade, or that they are so incompetent.  Neither of those options speak well to keeping them in leadership roles.  That’s why Joe Biden answered the man’s question carefully, and in my mind, completely appropriately.  If Republicans want to become a party of real reform, they’d better get used to acting on it.

When asked about his comments by Fox news today, Biden said he has no evidence that criminal charges would be warranted and no intention of pursuing action against the current president.

"What is true is the United States Congress is trying to preserve records on questions that relate to whether or not the law has been violated by anyone," Biden said, adding: "But, you know, there's been an awful lot of unsavoury stuff that's gone on. And the mere fact … that it occurred in a previous administration doesn't mean [a subsequent] Justice Department, if, in fact, there's evidence, shouldn't pursue them. "But I have no evidence of any of that. No one's talking about pursuing President Bush criminally."



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sarah Barracuda

Palin delivers a knockout

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin & The '08 Election

Despicable feminist Sally Quinn slams Sarah Palin, and says a mother should put her kids first and be subservient to her husband -- which, Sally presumes to tell us, is what an evangelical wife is. Liberals like Sally and Soledad O'Brien can have kids and work, but Sarah Palin can't be a mom and govern.

"Governor Sarah Palin -- just in her being, just in her essence -- destroys every myth that the liberals have told us that they want in women. The feminists have set everything back to their mothers' generation."

Newt Gingrich broke a cardinal liberal rule. Good! He took on a reporter hiding behind the label of "objectivity," and dared say that Palin has more experience than Obama.

Biden's pandering to senior citizens struck a chord with a Hillary supporter who buys this BS that Bush destroyed Social Security and the economy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Demand McCain Pay For Palin Pick

When MSNBC's Chris Matthews suggested in Denver that Barack Obama earned his present elevation in American politics, unlike "showcase...

Read Full Article

Liberals find no joy when Republicans select women or minorities for top positions. They are all fraudulent traitors to their own apparent group interests. Conservative blacks aren't really black. Conservative Latinos aren't really Latino. Now, conservative women are somehow not really women.

John McCain made a bold choice in not merely picking a woman, but picking a pro-life woman courageous enough to put her motherhood where her mouth is. Now the media want him to pay dearly for it. The idea that they would lecture anyone else about rumor-mongering or "Swift-boating" ought to be laughed off the public stage.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

About That Trooper

You'll be hearing a lot in coming weeks about Sarah Palin's "abuse of power" in trying to get a state cop fired. Here's the back story you won't be hearing.

Read Full Article

Now ask yourself this: If you were Sarah Palin and had such a revealing look at Mike Wooten, would you have wanted him on the force? Palin was acting as any concerned citizen should after a close encounter with an unfit cop. If there's abuse of power in this story, it lies on the side of bureaucrats and unions protecting officers whose behavior makes them a danger to the public.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not That Bad


Secret damning Troopergate e-mails from Palin not that damning
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Employee Free Choice Act Effectively Eliminates Secret Ballot Organizing Elections

Organized labor's top priority is the deceptively named Employee Free Choice Act, which replaces secret ballot elections with publicly signed union cards.

Eliminating Secret Ballot Elections

Organized labor's highest legislative priority is the deceptively named Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA). EFCA replaces secret ballot elections—the method by which most workers join unions—with publicly signed union cards. While eliminating secret ballots is extremely unpopular, many EFCA support­ers argue that the legislation merely gives workers the choice between organizing using secret ballots or pub­licly signed cards. This argument is false; nothing in the legislation gives workers any control over union organizing tactics. Though EFCA still allows for secret ballot elections under unusual circumstances, stan­dard union organizing tactics ensure that publicly signed union cards will dominate the recognition pro­cess. As a result, the misnamed Employee Free Choice Act effectively eliminates secret ballot elections.

EFCA requires employers to recognize a union— without an election—once organizers collect cards from a majority of employees.[6] Indeed, the act states that once the union submits signatures from over 50 percent of the employees to the NLRB, it must certify the union without an election. Under EFCA, holding a secret ballot election once unions collect cards from a majority of workers would become illegal.

Unions virtually never call for elections with cards signed by a minority of workers. Organizers are generally instructed to collect cards from 60 to 70 percent of workers in a company before going to the polls.[10] Unions openly state that they do not go to an election without a supermajority of cards:

EFCA gives union representatives—and these representatives alone—the choice of how to orga­nize workers. Union organizers' goal is to recruit new dues-paying members, not give workers an opportunity to privately say “No” to union repre­sentation. Unions will tell workers that cards count only toward an election, then demand recognition without a vote. Employees cannot sign cards to request an election without having those cards count toward a card-check majority. Unions have demonstrated that they have no interest in allowing workers to privately reject union representation. The misnamed Employee Free Choice Act effec­tively ends secret ballot organizing elections for American workers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As Gustav Lands, There Are Lessons To Be Learned

Regardless of Gustav's outcome, politicians will likely push for making national disaster preparedness more Washington-centric. Such ideas should be rejected.

More Federal Control Is Not the Answer

The federal government does have a unique and important role to play. Only the federal government can build a national response system to mobilize the resources of the nation in the face of a catastrophic disaster. In virtually every instance, however, state and local leaders will remain in charge, and national assets—whether they come from other states, the private sector, or the federal government—will be in support of their efforts. One lesson that should not be learned from the disaster of Hurricane Katrina is that all the answers to addressing the needs of America in the face of a catastrophic disaster are to be found in Washington.

What Washington should not do in the wake of Gustav is follow the lead of Congress after Katrina and attempt to make national disaster response more “Washington-centric.” Centralized preparedness and response will never be timely and flexible enough to meet local needs in a large-scale disaster. In addition, such approaches undermine the Constitutional principle of federalism. Congress should reject efforts to make Americans more dependent on Washington.

Katrina was used as an excuse to try to make more federal spending and more federal control the answer for responding to disasters. Regardless of the outcome of Gustav and the sufficiency of the national response, some pundits and politicians will likely push for making national disaster preparedness and response more Washington-centric. Congress should reject such solutions.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barracuda

Source at TNR: Underestimate Palin at your peril

I’m going to interrupt my breathing into a paper bag about the Blotter’s Troopergate story — the only source for which is a Democrat, do note — to bring you this rare shot of optimism, just because it’s the third instance I’ve heard something like this in the past 24 hours. KP, an Alaska native, tells me via e-mail that the word back home is she’s a “phenomenal politician … [who] just blows people away and tunes out the media and criticism.” That jibes with this too-good-to-check Bill Kristol anecdote about Palin all but laughing at McCain staffers fretting that she can’t stand up to media scrutiny. And now here’s another Alaska source warning TNR that the left shouldn’t invest too heavily in its fantasies of reducing her to a blubbering puddle. The Democrats, ironically, seem to have bought into the “ordinary gal” image even more totally than the right has; they’re actually starting pools about when she’ll finally wilt under the pressure and beg off the ticket. Put me down for “never”

Don’t believe him? Read through this indispensable Time magazine story, dateline Wasilla, for a description of the sort of hardball Mayor Palin used to play. The hockey mom evidently knows how to use social issues to her advantage. Exit question about the Troopergate story: What’s the Democrat in charge of the investigation doing leaking about what it’s “likely” to conclude? If they’ve finished gathering their facts, go ahead and put out the report. If they haven’t, then how can he conclude what’s likely? And, follow-up question: Assuming for the sake of argument that McCain didn’t vet her down to the atomic level, surely the Troopergate thing at least was thoroughly vetted, no? It’s set to drop on October 31 and has the potential to finish him if it’s damaging. That would be the one thing, I think, they have a foot-thick binder of information on.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive