About Me

Name: Always To The...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

'Terror On Wane,' 'Al-Qaida On Run' And Other Headlines You Won't See

As President Bush's term winds down, signs are there that the war on terror is being won. The conflict in Iraq is ebbing, and worldwide terror attacks are down. When will someone call it what it is? VICTORY.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Only Word For Bush Grade Is Pre-Historic

One hundred nine historians already nearly unanimously agree. They call the presidency of George W. Bush a "failure." The History News...

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blame Washington, Not Oil Companies

Senate Democrats, dragging executives from five major U.S. oil companies before them for a second day, say they're alarmed by our "failed" oil markets. What they should be is ashamed.

Read Full Article

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hay Chuck

An interesting story here just posted at AmericanThinker.com by Marc Sheppard. Senator Chuck Schumer, who is on the Judiciary Committee, says that coercing Saudi Arabia to increase oil production by one million barrels a day would drop the per-barrel price by $25, saving Americans 62 cents per gallon at the gas pump. Now, wait a second. It was just barely a week ago -- I remember this, we had the audio on this program -- it was just a week ago that Senator Schumer said drilling in ANWR was a waste of time because the same amount of oil, a million barrels a day coming from ANWR, would only ease oil prices by a penny. So a million barrels of oil from Saudi Arabia would drop the barrel price $25, according to Senator Schumer; a million barrels a day from ANWR would drop the barrel price by only one cent.

American Thinker: How Much Have the Democrats Cost You at the Pump? -Marc Sheppard
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gaseous Bipartisan Demagoguery From The Dems–And McCain

Michelle Malkin  •  May 22, 2008 10:12 AM

Today on the Hill, lawmakers in both parties get a second chance to strut and tut-tut as they harangue oil company executives about high gas prices–and display their abject ignorance of, and hostility towards, basic economic principles of supply and demand.

John Hinderaker at Power Line has a good rundown of the back-and-forth between the businessmen who make a living creating wealth and the politicians who tax and take it away.

Read the whole thing.

Unfortunately, it’s not just gaseous Democrats demonizing oil companies as evil profiteers and crusading for punitive measures like the Carter-era windfall profits tax that Ronald Reagan valiantly battled.

The RNC rightly took on Obama’s support for the tax.

But here’s GOP presidential candidate John McCain in Charlotte, NC

Transcript:

MCCAIN: “Um, I don’t like obscene profits being made anywhere–and I’d be glad to look not just at the windfall profits tax–that’s not what bothers me–but we should look at any incentives that we are giving to people, that or industries or corporations that are distorting the market.”

I warned you of McCain’s class warrior rhetoric in January when he sneered at those who embrace the profit motive and bashed “greedy” corporations who engage in free enterprise.

Would Ronald Reagan ever stand up in front of the liberal media and Republican voters and inveigh against “obscene profits?”

Any pro-McCain trolls out there care to explain? 50 brownie “points” available now!

Background: IBD’s excellent overview of the windfall profits-taxing windbags here. The answer McCain should have given

See also: Jonah Goldberg, The Windfall Profits Tax Slap.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Directly Contradicts What He Said In The Heat Of The Republican Primary About Having “Gotten The Message”

McCain: “We must enact comprehensive immigration reform”


Michelle Malkin  •  May 22, 2008 07:23 PM [Below]

Shamnesty John McCain is back in full force: No, he never “got the message”


First, my friends, a reminder of what was printed right here on January 23, 2008

And, now, straight from the campaign trail with Arnold “Move Left” Schwarzenegger, McCain has shed every last pretense that he “got the message” from grass-roots immigration enforcement proponents and is back to his full, open-borders shamnesty push. No surprise to any of you. But his complete regression back to the “comprehensive immigration reform” euphemism is a notable milestone.

Also, you don’t need to guess anymore how he would have voted on the Feinstein/Craig illegal alien farmworker amnesty

Same old, same old about sham background checks.

Been there, done that.

They’ve learned nothing. Nada. Zippo. How about you?



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive