Posted by
Always To The Right on Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:04:53 AM
I did read some about 93 being shot down [I believe something about a "white plane"] {also some statement by Sec Def} why do you believe that would be embarassment to administration? There was than a belief plane was hijacked so shoot down would be justified. Other planes had crashed into WTC, but if calls faked or altered & gov't behind it than why didn't 93 go right to target [whatever it was]? But if for whatever reason 93 was shot down than it would answer another big question as to why none of the planes was shot down. Alot of conspiracy people say none of the planes was shot down, now you mention that 93 was [possible] shot down & gov't would not admit it, seems like damned for not and damned for doing [but wait gov't would not admit shooting for some reason]. Sounds like go in circles.
Which is why it's difficult to prove a negative. I don't have to prove that the gov't didn't do it.